Englishالعربية Soon
Under attack?
Source code review · Application security testing

Most breaches start in code that shipped years ago.

Static, dynamic and interactive analysis applied to your source code and running application, with each finding checked for exploitability before it reaches a developer. The output is a list of real problems, ranked, with the place to fix them.

Confirmed, not suspected

A finding nobody can exploit is not a priority.

Candidate vulnerabilities are verified automatically by generating safe test requests against the running application. Developers spend their time on flaws that can actually be used, rather than triaging a scanner report.

Built into delivery

Security that runs on every commit, not once a year.

Analysis integrates with your version control, build pipeline and issue tracker, so findings arrive as tickets in the tools your developers already use, at the point where fixing them is cheap.

Capabilities

How the code is analysed

A single method finds a fraction of what is there. These are combined on every engagement.

Static analysis

Source code examined without running it, tracing how untrusted input reaches a sensitive operation across files and functions.

Dynamic analysis

The running application probed from the outside, which catches what only appears once the code is deployed and configured.

Interactive analysis

The application observed from inside while it runs, linking an external request to the exact code path it triggered.

Dependency analysis

Third party libraries and components inventoried and checked against known vulnerabilities and licence obligations.

Automatic exploit verification

Safe test requests generated for candidate findings, so exploitability is demonstrated rather than assumed.

Data flow evidence

Each finding comes with the path from entry point to sink, which is what makes a fix reviewable.

Remediation guidance

The recommended place to fix is identified, so the change lands once instead of being patched at three symptoms.

Incremental scanning

Subsequent runs analyse what changed, which keeps the review inside a normal build window.

Pipeline integration

Results delivered into version control, build systems and issue trackers as part of the existing developer workflow.

How the review runs

Four weeks from repository access to a fix list your developers accept

The value is not the report. It is that the findings survive review by the people who have to change the code.

Web applicationsMobile applicationsAPIsBack office systemsPayment flowsInternal services
01
Scope
Repositories, languages, frameworks, entry points and the environments available for testing.
02
Analyse
Static, dynamic and interactive analysis run together, with dependencies inventoried.
03
Verify
Candidate findings tested for exploitability, and false positives removed before anyone sees them.
04
Report
Findings ranked by exploitability and impact, each with the data flow and the recommended fix location.
05
Retest
Fixes verified after remediation, and the pipeline configured so regressions are caught on commit.
Timelines depend on codebase size and how much test environment access is available. Scope is fixed in writing before work starts.
Delivery model

One off review

A defined engagement against a release or a repository, with a report, a walkthrough for the developers, and a retest once fixes land.

Learn more →

Delivery model

Continuous testing

Analysis wired into your pipeline and monitored by us, with findings triaged and delivered as tickets on an agreed cadence.

Managed SOC →

Related

Controls that work alongside it

WAF

Shield a known vulnerability at the edge while the code fix works through release.

Application assessment

Manual testing against the deployed application, beyond what analysis tooling reaches.

Penetration testing

The same application judged as part of the wider attack surface.

Start with one repository.

Give us access to a single application. You get confirmed findings, ranked, with the fix locations identified.